亚洲一区无码,最好看的2018中文字幕,欧美激情有码手机在线,最新无码国产在线视频2021,www.操

<u id="5fbiy"><pre id="5fbiy"><samp id="5fbiy"></samp></pre></u>

<i id="5fbiy"></i>
<i id="5fbiy"></i><sub id="5fbiy"></sub>

<sub id="5fbiy"><tr id="5fbiy"></tr></sub>
          <video id="5fbiy"><input id="5fbiy"></input></video>

          Dynamic Considerations in Prediction of Fracture of Ultra High-Strength Steel During Crash

          2018-10-16 10:56:00
          LUQIMENG
          Original
          3760

          High strain rate response of automotive alloys (tensile + shearcharacterization):

          1、DP980 (SMDI), DP600

          2、Fully quenched Usibor? 1500-AS, Ductibor? 500-AS

          Effect of strain rate on fracture?

          1、Shear conditions (zero triaxiality)

          2、Positive triaxiality conditions


          Weld failure characterization – “spot weld groups”



          ? Achieves shear strains easily on the order of unity with relatively constant triaxiality of zero .


          ? Appropriate for high rate testing in Hopkinson bar or high speed hydraulics (1-1000/s).



          Issue today lies in the majority of fracture characterization for crash CAE being doneat quasi-static rates…


          Potential sources of rate effects:

          ? Elevated strain rates
          ? Temperature increase through adiabatic heating (~90% of plastic work convertedto heat) *
          ? Inertial effects




          ? Rate sensitivity is initially positive, but becomes negative atlarge strains
          ? Promotes earlier localization under shear loading


          ? Onset of shear cracking is determined as the point where thehardening rate is exhausted 1


          ? Repeatable and eliminates the need to detect fracture based on visible cracking 2





          In tension, positive rate sensitivity promotes higher failure strains as strain rate increases.


          In shear, thermal localizationreduces failure strain (as measuredusing DIC) with increasing strain rate.




          ? Given the coarse meshesnecessitated in vehicle CAE, failurestrains should be measured using alength scale on the order of theelement size


          ? DIC virtual strain gauge length: 0.3mm) versus 3-5 mm element size


          ? For these materials, shear strain tofailure input to FEA decreases withstrain rate!


          ? Less impact on positive triaxialityregime, however, confoundingresults exist in the literature








          ? Earlier localization,narrower thermal fieldfor the higher strengthconditions


          ? Thermal localizationenhanced for higherstrength alloys


          ? The strong workhardening of the DP600is clearly beneficial


          ? Interaction between nugget, HAZ and parent metal strength(single weld)


          ? Test method for weld group testing (Mode I Caiman)







          Write a Comment
          Seven multiply One =
          Comment will be posted after it is reviewed.
          QR Code